THIS refers to the article `Rangers dilemma` (Dec 29) by Shahab Usto. While analysing the current confrontation between Sindh and centre some basic important facts have been overlooked.
Rangers Ordinance 1959 clearly defines its role and says that it is restricted to defend border areas and prevention and detection of smuggling. But Para 7 (a)allows provincial governments to reinforce the police for the maintenance of law and order where it is necessary.
The point to understand is that the present deployment of Rangers is not covered by the 1959 ordinance, but is deployed under Article 4 of the AntiTerrorism Act (ATA) of 1997 by the federal government. Any changes made or restrictions imposed on them should be done aftergettingthe approvalofthe federal government.
It is true that cracking down on corruption was not part of their mandate.
Corruption is rampant in the country.
Almost all people in prominent positions in the country, including retired generals, bureaucrats, former prime ministers and business tycoons are accused of corruption but the crackdown is only taking place in Sindh. That is what the perception has prevailed and must be attended.
If we go through para 11 H (1) (2) and (3) of Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997, it comprehensively covers funding for terrorism even on suspicion. The Sindh government cannot take cover under Article 4 (2) of the ATA of 1997 because that clause is no more applicable after the start of the National Action Plan which was started with the consensus of all the political parties.
The writer has failed to mention the role of the judiciary in the tussle between Sindh and the Rangers over the issue of extended powers. It is surprising why the Sindh government did not move the Sindh High Court over the issue instead of indulging in war of words.
Mukhtar Ahmed Karachi (2) THIS refers to letter `Rangers powers` (Dec 28) by M. Iqbal. The Rangers powers have been under discussion for a long time now. Those in favour earlier are now opposing them because the corrupt are feeling the heat.
Battle lines between forces of corruption andforces ofaccountability have been drawn. Readers like me are helpless spectators praying for across-the-board accountability without an escape route through plea bargaining.
