Increase font size Decrease font size Reset font size

Charity to social work

BY R A H BE L R A H M A N-TA H I R 2026-07-08
PAKISTAN does not have a giving problem. Sunni Muslims in Pal(istan pay over Rs619 billion in zakat annually, in addition to sadaqah and waqf endowments. Pakistanis give at mosques, through family networks and civil society organisations that have held communities together for decades. But charity is not social work.

Social worl( is a scientific discipline grounded in human behaviour, practised with mindfulness and critical reflection on power and privilege. It champions autonomy and dignity, not dependency.

Zakat is a redistributive obligation meant to restore self-sufficiency, not establish need. Yet in practice, eligibility determination should be followed by structured follow-up case management, referrals and ongoing checl(-ins that help someone move beyond recurring need.

Social work`s history is not one of progress but one of power. In Britain and the US, the profession grew out of frameworl(s that blurred the line between charity and control and between goodwill and authority. Uncomfortable as that history is, we cannot build accountable, equitable systems without honestly confronting it.

The Elizabethan Poor Laws of 1601 determined that aid was reserved for the `deserving poor` (women, children, elderly, disabled) while able-bodied men were punished for their poverty. This bias crossed into the US in 19th-century America through `friendly visitors` These were largely privileged women who went door to door in poor and immigrant neighbourhoods, deciding who deserved help and how to assimilate them. Their visits disguised surveillance as kindness. In British India, similar philanthropy justiñed colonial rule. In all cases, relief was dictated by the `powerful`, with no input from recipients and little regard for harm.

Social work emerged in the US after decades of advocacy and institutional readiness. By 1952, the Council on Social Worl( Education had standardised curricula and accreditation nationwide.

US-based social worl(ers today are trained under nine core competencies covering ethics, diversity, human rights, research, policy and intervention at the individual, community and systems levels. They work in social service agencies, hospitals, schools, courts, child welfare, elder services and emergency response, as clinicians, case managers, programme developers and policy advocates.

Pakistan`s path has differed; not from lesser care but from missing infrastructure. After Partition, the country faced millions of refugees without a profes-sional welfare system. In 1951, the government turned to the UN for help, resulting in emergency training courses focused on refugee care. These were triage responses, not academic programmes.

Not until 1954 did the University of Punjab launch the country`s first postgraduate diploma in social work, followed by Karachi (1961), Balochistan (1974) and Peshawar (1978) each relying heavily on Western curricula. Not until 2014 did human rights education and supervised fieldworl( become mandatory.

In 2025, the Higher Education Commission released a nationally standardised, outcome-based curriculum developed by Pakistani academics from allfour provinces. The BS requires 143 credit hours, four field placements, a supervisedinternshipand acapstoneproject. The curriculum addresses Pakistan`s social realities, incorporates Islamic studies, and is rooted in local communities. This is not a borrowed framework translated; it is genuinely indigenous.Curriculum alone cannot close the gap. The public and many nonprofits still do not distinguish social worl( from charity work, and that is not a minor semantic dif ference.

Charity flows from goodwill. Social work is grounded in scie nce that involves str-uctured assessment, evidence-based intervention, ethical accountability and a professional commitment to honest selfreflection. Without a national professional association, a licensing structure and an enforceable code of ethics, the field cannot regulate itself. Without these measures, the well-intentioned philanthropist of Pakistani civil society risks repeating the mistakes of that 19th-century friendly visitor, generous and well-meaning, but still operating within the very hierarchies they hoped to dismantle.

Pal(istan has the generosity and an indigenous social work curriculum. It needs the institutional will across government, universities, and civil society to build a profession worthy of the people, built by Pakistanis for Pal(istanis on the understanding that social work is not an act of goodwill; it is a profession. It is time we treated it as one. • The writer is an associate professor at Fordham University`s Graduate School of Social Service in New York.