ISLAMABAD: Successive governments have miserably failed to improve disaster risk management during the last 19 years since Oct 8, 2005 earthquake despite having massive management structure and elaborate legal, financial support base as well as state-of-the-art policies at the federal level.

This was stated in a PattanCoalition 38 survey that was conducted duringthe last10 days.

The report blamed the state bureaucracy which frustrated every attempt to establish disaster management structures at the local or community level.

Reading various sections of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) at its website look highly impressive, but it lacks extremely vital elements such as the participation of disaster-prone communities in planning and implementing disaster risk reduction.

`It is highly important to highlight that the National Disaster Management Act, Policy and Plan acknowledge the importance of community participation. However, the NDMA`s detailed roles and responsibility matrix for implementation of NDMP-III conspicuously ignores its importance and limits it just to top-down `community aware-ness` though as priority number one in the matrix,` it stated.

Survey clearly shows that NDMA and PDMAs had even failed to perform this role as more than twothirds of respondents of the surveyed location said they did not get any early warning or alerts, while 97pc of respondents claimed that they did not receive any kind of assistance, training or awareness from any of the government department.

The survey was conducted in 32 disaster-prone locations across 20 districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, Sindh and Islamabad. Welltrained enumerators conducted 503 face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire by including 310 male and 193 female respondents.

The surveyresultsindicatethata majority of 475 households in the targeted communities faced emergencies during the recent monsoon season. Additionally, 471 respondents reported that their villages or neighbourhoods experienced significant damages and losses due to river floods, hill torrents, heavy rainfall, urban flooding, poor drainage systems and landslides.

The affected communities encountered various kinds of challenges and losses. According to the survey, 342 respondents reported damages to their homes, 329 reported crop losses, 260 households experienced damage to household appliances, 225 households lost livestock, 160 reported business losses, 174 reported grain and fodder losses, and 158 reported infrastructure damage including roads, schools, hospitals, religious/worship places, and electricity and gas lines.More than two-thirds of the respondents (68pc) did not receive any early warning. Those who received the early warning messages complained about the lack of proper understanding of the messages. A large proportion, 97pc of the respondents, indicated that they were never consulted for contingency planning or received any training to deal with an emergency or disaster.

A significantly large portion of the respondents (42pc) indicated that the local governments do not exist in their region and where exist, they lack functioning capacities due to the unavailability of funds and authority. Eighteen per cent of the respondents blamed the local MPs for the losses, while 15pc pointed fingers at the provincial government.

About one-third criticised the federal government and its agencies for the devastating floods and losses.

The majority of the respondents were not familiar with government institutions responsible for mitigating disaster risks such as NDMA, PDMAs, DDMAs, FFC, and PDM.

However, 68pc of the respondents were familiar with Rescue 1122.

The survey results clearly emphasised the establishment of elected local governments in all provinces to manage the risks and disasters by making them financially, administratively and politically autonomous.

The survey also pointed out the need for effective communication strategies by the relevant authorities to inform the public about impending natural disasters which is also given top priority in the National Disaster Management Policy.