SEVEN months into his term, the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa has already started to shake things up in an attempt to shake the ghosts of the past, when the judiciary appeared reluctant to carry out accountability orintrospection.

Not only did he bring bacl< full court meetings, but the chief judge also agreed to dilute his powers as the CJP under the Practice and Procedure Act 2023, which was suspended by his predecessor Umar Ata Bandial, who termed the law `interference in court affairs`.

In the words of senior lawyer Akram Sheikh, an era of transparency and openness was ushered in when CJP Isa took oath of office in Sept last year.`Qazi sahib has pioneered a new era in our superior judiciary and can be rightly termed as having brought revolutionary changes in [the] running of the highest court,` he said, adding that CJP Isa took oath on Sunday, and the first thing he did was to convene a meeting of the full court.

On the same day, he decided to take up a case about the Practice and Procedure Act, filed months before he took charge.

The chief judge also formed a committee of three senior judges for the constitution of benches under Article 184(3), a power earlier held by the `master of roster`, i.e. the chief justice.

Mr Sheikh hoped that CJP Isa would be able to turn the court into an `actually final but satisfactory resort for consumers of justice`.

Former additional attorney general (AAG) Tariq MehmoodKhokhar agreed. He said CJP Isa inherited an institution with deepening fissures and lacl(ing the power to effect elections under the Constitution, but he proved to be instrumental in plugging institutional fissures and holding general elections.

Adherence to Constitution At the very outset, Justice Isa seemed to make it clear that the court would concern itself with the obligations enshrined in the Constitution and all judgements would emanate from that document.

This meant that the court would not overstep its bounds, as seen in the past, nor let anyone else do so.

To back up this commitment, the CJP took up two cases: the general elections case and the Musharraf case.

While he remained steadfast in his desire not to let the govern-ment delay elections any further than they already had been, a landmarl( verdict on Jan 10, 2024 upheld the death penalty awarded to late military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf.

In another daring move before taking office, Justice Isa attended a session of the National Assembly on the golden jubilee of the Constitution. He later shrugged off clamour on social media by saying that the occasion was one of celebration for all citizens, and not the exclusive domain of any particular political party or institution.

ZAB reference Another achievement of the Isaled court is the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto reference, which took over a decade to decide. During a visit to a court reporters` event last year when he was still the senior puisne judge, a journalist had quippedthat `whenever we talk of the rule of law, we are faced with a paradox that the one who framed the 1973 Constitution, still awaits justice`.

The journalist was referring to the hanging of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto on April 4, 1979, as the presidential reference seeking an opinion on revisiting the death sentence in the case was still pending while the country was celebrating the golden jubilee of the 1973 Constitution.

Soon after assuming the top office, CJP Isa not only fixed the reference for hearing, but had also decided the same on March 6, by admitting that fair trial and due process to Bhutto was denied by the Lahore High Court (LHC) and then appellate court`s final endorsement.

The reference was filed in April 2011 and heard last time in Jan 2012 by then Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. After that, it was not taken up by successive CJPs for 12 years.

`You need a considerable moral courage to accept the grave injustice done to the then Prime Minister by none other than the top judiciary itself,` commented a senior counsel on condition of anonymity.

The other achievements of the top judge include live streaming of court proceedings, reversal of lifetime disqualification for elected representatives, accountability of a brother judge (Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi), and relief to ex-IHC judge Shaulcat Siddiqui, who was sacl(ed for claiming the involvement of the ISI in the court affairs.

This last decision also proved to be a catalyst for others to come forward with their gripes, as sixjudges of the Islamabad High Court finding solace in the top court`s exoneration of their former colleague found the courage to raise some uncomfortable issues before the Supreme Judicial Council.

Faults Butthe topjudgeis not without his detractors.

The PTI election symbol case, choosing returning officers (ROs) from the executive, loss of reserved seats for PTI, JIT notices to journalists and interim orders in the military courts have enraged many, said Mr Khokhar, the former additional attorney general.

He added that the timing was not propitious for the CJP, and a social media campaign against him only added to it.

Mr Sheikh, the seasoned lawyer, said the CJP did earn a `negative perception` for deciding political cases, but overall `he can rightly claim to hiscredit the drastic changes he introduced` as the top judge. The lawyer said that through a live telecast of trials, he turned the closed-door Supreme Court into an open, transparent, and dynamic institution.

After becoming the CJP, Justice Isa also appointed the SC`s firstever woman registrar, Jazeela Aslam, who was a district and sessions judge in Okara. His decision to invite his spouse Sarina Isa to stand next to him during the oath-taking ceremony also speaks for his progressive credentials.

Perceived as an upright judge, the top adjudicator is certainly not without his faults. He is also routinely subjected to intense criticism for his straightforward, and often condescending approach and penchant for observations. But even his detractors accept openly that one `needs extreme courage to build such a legacy`.