THERE was no other choice. Despite assurances of consultations with key stakeholders, the government passed the Peca amendment law and has forced journalist bodies, the legal fraternity, and human rights groups to launch a united front against this draconian law, culminating in a convention at the Karachi Press Club on March 1. Journalists have been at the forefront, organising protests, filing legal challenges, and raising awareness. Their efforts have borne fruit, with various civil society groups joining their cause. With the convention, this movement is gaining critical mass. The decision to band together can be a powerful statement against a repressive legal framework. The concerns are well-founded. Peca expands the state`s powers to target individuals for expressing opinions online. It grants authorities sweeping control over digital content, putting all citizens at risk of censorship and persecution. Even before this law was passed, journalists, academics, doctors, students, and activists had been subjected to intimidation. The new amendments formalise these excesses, shielding state actors from accountability while stifling legitimate discourse.

The March 1 convention must serve as a platform for wider mobilisation. While journalists have taken the lead, other societal groups should also step forward. Suppression of speech is not an issue confined to the media it is a direct attack on the rights of every citizen. Teachers, students, labour organisations, and civil society must recognise that this law threatens their freedoms.

Unchallenged, its reach will extend beyond journalists to anyone questioning authority. The government must acknowledge that steamrolling critical voices is neither sustainable nor democratic.

It should immediately repeal the latest amendments to Peca and engage in genuine dialogue with relevant stakeholders to draft a more balanced law. Policy recommendations should include independent oversight of content regulation, clear safeguards against abuse, and a commitment to upholding freedom of expression as enshrined in the Constitution. The unity displayed by stakeholders against Peca shows that citizens will not quietly accept the erosion of their fundamental rights. The government must heed these voices before the consequences of this legislation feed into a wider societal discontent. A free press is not an adversary; it is an essential pillar of democracy.