Increase font size Decrease font size Reset font size

Ignoring engineers

2023-12-25
THIS is with reference to the letter `Discrimination` (Dec 4), which talked about ignoring agricultural engineering graduates for positions in the Department of Irrigation. I firmly believe that this exclusion is unjustifiable, particularly when considering that agricultural engineering graduates undertake a more extensive and relevant course load during theirundergraduate programmes than do other engineering graduates. This rigorous coursework not only imparts a deeper understanding of irrigation systems, but also enhances their overall skillset significantly.

It is paramount to underscore that professionals in the said department play a crucial role in the distribution and management of water for agricultural lands. Agricultural engineering graduates possess not only specialised knowledge in irrigation systems, but also a profound understanding of agriculture itself. This dual expertise renders them exceptionally well-suited for positions in the department.

The existing practice of not recruiting agricultural engineering graduates for roles in the department is both unfair and biased. It represents a form of discriminatory treatment towards agricultural engineers, who, despite possessing almost double the knowledge and skill required, find themselves overlooked in the recruitment process.

Those concerned should earnestly reconsider the matter. The persistent issue of unjust treatment must be promptly addressed, and recruitment policies should be revised to ensure that agricultural engineering graduates are fairly considered based on merit.

This is matter that holds significant importance and has long been a source ofconcernfor agriculturalengineering graduates. By addressing the issue, we can not only promote fairness, but also contribute to fostering a more inclusive and merit-driven recruitment process.

Habib Hyder Laghari Edmonton, Canada