WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court`s landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump, except perhaps on the verypolicy heis seekingto enforce.

An executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called `universal` injunctions.

But the Supreme Court`s ruling on Friday, while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief, left enough room for the challengers to Trump`s directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legalityplays out.

`I do not expect the president`s executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect, said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions whose work the court`s majority cited extensively in Friday`s ruling.

Trump`s executive order directs federalagencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also called a `green card` holder.

The threejudgesfound thattheorder likely violates citizenship language in the US Constitution`s 14th Amendment. The directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days, a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those courts. The court`s six conservative justices delivered the majority ruling, granting Trump`s request to narrow the injunctions issued by the judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts.

Its three liberal members dissented.The ruling by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who Trump appointed to the court in 2020, emphasised the need to hem in the power of judges, warning against an `imperial` judiciary. Judges can provide `complete relief` only to the plaintiffs before them, Barrett wrote.

A host of policies That outcome was a major victory for Trump and his allies, who have repeatedly denounced judges who have impeded his agenda. It could make it easier for the administration to implement his policies, including to accelerate deportations of migrants, restrict transgen-der rights, curtail diversity and inclusion efforts, and downsize the federal government many of which have tested the limits of executive power.

In the birthright citizenship dispute,therulingleftopenthe potential for individual plaintiffs to seek relief beyond themselves through class action lawsuits targeting a policy that would upend the longheld understanding that the Constitution confers citizenship on virtually anyone born on US soil.

Bray said he expects a surge of new class action cases, resulting in `class-protective` injunctions.

-Reuters