Page 7 · Opinion

Circadian rhythm

FOR decades, society has blindly accepted the rigid 9-5 work schedule as the universal standard for productivity. However, this one-size-fits-all approach is deeply flawed, forcing the proverbial night owls and early birds into boxes that stifle their potential.

It is time we seriously evaluated the rising concepts of chronoworking and the push for flexible schedules. Chronoworking is the practice of adjusting your working hours to match your natural energy levels and circadian rhythms. While some people thrive with early morning tasks, others find that their ultimate concentration peaks late in the afternoon or evening. Forcing individuals to work against these biological clocks often leads to burnout and exhaustion.

This rigidity has inevitably given rise to rebellious sleep schedules or revenge bedtime procrastination. When people feel their entire day is consumed by demanding work hours, they frequently sacrifice sleep just to carve out a few hours of personalfreedom at night. While sacrificing sleep can carryhealthrisks,the root causeis not necessarily poor discipline; it is the result of a rigid system that fails to treat workers properly.

The traditional 40-hour fixed structure needs to evolve. By transitioning to flexible, outcome-based work models, employers can unlock massive gains in efficiency while protecting the mental health and autonomy of their workers. It is time our workplaces and educational institutions respected individual chronotypes. When we stop forcing round pegs into square holes, we create a more energised community.

Pirah Kanwal Karachi